It seems that the 14-35mm beats both the 16 and the 24-105 - at 16, 24 and 28mm. The 24-105 seems better at 35mm. Pro's: + Smaller and lighter than the 24-105, so could be more comfortable to carry on camera. + Seems sharper than the 24-105 all the way up to about 30mm. + Extra 12.5% of reach at the wide end (2mm) vs the 16mm.
The device is protected with extra seals to prevent failures caused by dust, raindrops, and water splashes. Has a metal mount. Sony E PZ 18-105 mm F4 G OSS. Sony FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM. A metal mount is generally superior to a plastic mount as it is more durable. weight. This is certainly a far more useful lens than Nikon's lame 24-70mm f/4; 105mm is 50% longer than 70mm and the difference between the great shots I got at the top (all shot between 91 and 105mm) and dullsville. The Canon has an extra programmable control ring on the front, the Nikon does not. User's Guide. Top Sample Images Intro Compatibility Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DG DN | Art Tamron SP 24-70mm F/2.8 Di VC USD G2 Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS II USM Lens Sigma 24-105mm F4 DG OS HSM | Art My concerns: Canon 24-70: Price. No IS. Autofocus noise cuz on-camera shotgun. Sigma 24-70: Weight. Sharpness issues/softness. Autofocus problems. . 924 35 559 135 320 190 421 196